By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Background moutain Attolight

EBIC/EBAC imaging

EBIC and EBAC techniques use an electron beam to image electrical properties of materials in SEM. EBAC maps current pathways, useful for detecting defects like short circuits, while EBIC highlights electric fields, mainly in semiconductor junctions, revealing key material properties.
MacBook mockup

Introduction

Electron beam induced current (EBIC) and electron beam absorbed current (EBAC) are imaging techniques that can be employed in an electron microscope in addition to secondary electron (SE) and backscattered electron (BSE) imaging. EBAC reveals current pathways through the sample as image contrast. It is used to detect short circuits and broken connections in electrical devices. Similarly, EBIC shows electric fields in a sample and is principally used to characterize semiconductor junctions. Both require electrical connection(s) to the sample and benefit from a nanoprobing solution to harness their full potential.

Principles

In electron microscopy, the balance between sample irradiation, SE emission and backscattering creates a net absorbed charge in the sample, either positive or negative. Sample grounding is essential for this reason, as the specimen-absorbed charge and associated current must find a path to ground in order to prevent sample charging. The core idea of EBAC imaging is to place a current sensing device in the grounding path of specimen current, so that specimen current variations can be imaged as the beam is scanned on the sample. 

Figure 1 Depending on the balance between beam electrons, SE and BSE, the net specimen current flowing to ground can be either positive (left) or negative (right)

In the simplest EBAC implementation, specimen current is indiscriminately collected on the whole sample. Contrast occurs through modulation of the SE yield with sample topography and materials. In that case, EBAC images are fairly similar to SE, although they present the advantages of avoiding screening effects and non-linearity artifacts that sometimes occur with SE detectors.

Figure 2 The simplest EBAC imaging implementation indiscriminately collects specimen current across the sample. 

Another, and perhaps the best-known, EBAC imaging mode is also called Resistive Contrast Imaging (RCI). The sample is grounded separately from the current sensing path, which is wired to a high-conduction region of the sample, typically the interconnects of an electronic chip. Competing paths to ground for the specimen current (through the measurement device or not) allow to image electrical continuity in the sample at the nanoscale and detect defects in buried conductive layers.

Figure 3 In resistive contrast imaging, competing paths to ground are used to image the collected current in a low-resistance region of a sample (here depicted in yellow), revealing electrical continuity.

Finally, when an electric field is present in a sample, typically a semiconductor bipolar or Schottky junction, electron beam induced current (EBIC) can occur. Electron-hole pairs generated by the primary electron beam get separated by the field and collected on the competing grounds on both sides of the junction. At the junction, a large current amplification occurs, and the collected signal no longer depends on secondary electron/backscattering yield. Contrast directly depends on electric field intensity and can be linked back to the material’s properties such as doping concentration or carrier mobilities.

Figure 4 Electron Beam Induced Current is the amplification of specimen current by separation of e-h pairs generated by primary electrons. This occurs where built-in electric field is present in the sample.

The abovementioned configurations provide an overview of basic EBIC/EBAC imaging in scanning electron microscopy. In advanced utilisations of the technique, it might be useful to apply bias voltages and currents to the sample. For example, in EBIC measurements, applying voltage to a junction can dramatically modulate electric field inside the sample, allowing to study, among other things, breakdown effects and field spatial repartition in semiconductor devices under actual operating conditions.

Many different electrical properties are locally modulated by irradiation of a material with an electron beam, and sample biasing can be used with great ingenuity to recover these effects. Numerous techniques have thus been developed to achieve specific characterization needs using a combination of sample biasing and electrical detection. In scientific literature, terms such as EBIV, EBIRCh, RCI, DI-EBAC and Current Imaging can be encountered, among others.

Instrumentation

The instrumentation for EBIC / EBAC imaging leaves room to the researcher’s creativity. In the simplest single-contact-EBAC, current collection through the sample holder often makes the most sense. This configuration allows for EBAC imaging of all samples simultaneously mounted on the holder and the use of a Faraday cup to measure probe current precisely.

In multiple-contact configurations, when comfortable areas of the sample can be used for contacting, the sample can be wire-bounded to specialized holders. Attolight’s solution uses sample holders equipped with RF-compatible, industry-standard miniaturized coaxial connectors and cables. These provide the lowest-noise conditions for electrical signal collection from DC up to high frequencies and are thus ideal for EBIC/EBAC imaging. Alternatively, nanoprobing systems provide the most versatile signal collection, capable of probing nanostructures and sub-micron contacts in highly-integrated devices. 

After signal collection, the electrical current is usually amplified using a transimpedance amplifier. The amplification system in itself presents trade-offs between bandwidth, gain, linearity, and input noise. This means that EBIC/EBAC acquisitions usually aren’t as quick as typical SE/BSE acquisitions. They are, however, quantitative and allow measurement of important semiconductor properties such as minority carrier mobility[1]. 

Example results

The examples below show a comparison SEand EBAC imaging. 

A close-up of a microscopeDescription automatically generated
Figure 5 Simultaneous SE + EBAC imaging of gold nanoparticles on graphite. EBAC differs from SE imaging due to the “non-directional” signal collection and contribution from back-scattered electrons to the contrast.

A blue and red background with a chartDescription automatically generated with medium confidence
Figure 6 Quantitative representation of the previous EBAC micrograph. A 1 nA full scale measurement range is used. Note how EBAC current changes polarity between gold nanoparticles and the graphite substrate.

Benefits and Further Reading

References

Latest Scientific Publications

Nanowires of lead-methylamine iodide (CH3NH3PbI3) prepared by low temperature solution-mediated crystallization E. Horváth, M. Spina, Z. Szekrényes, K. Kamarás, R. Gaal, D. Gachet, L. Forró Nano Letters, 14, 6761–6766, 2014 2014
Applications

EBIC/EBAC imaging

Discover use cases involving EBIC/EBAC imaging.

Text Link
Process development
Text Link
Materials Science
Text Link
Micro/Nanowire
Text Link
GaN device
Text Link
Life Science
Text Link
Power electronics
Text Link
Optoelectronics
Equipment

Our Cutting-Edge Equipment using EBIC/EBAC imaging

Explore our high-resolution cathodoluminescence tools designed for superior materials characterization.

Ready to revolutionize your materials characterization approach?

Get in touch with us today to discover how our state-of-the-art cathodoluminescence tools can elevate your research and industry applications.
Already more than 30 systems installed globally!